System and method for intelligently determining image capture times for image applications

ABSTRACT

A method for organizing images from multiple image capture devices includes automatically determining a coarse offset between image capture times recorded in a first image capture device and image capture times recorded in a second image capture device. The coarse offset is determined by a computing a correlation between image counts of images captured by the first image capture device and images captured by the first image capture device. The method also includes adjusting the image capture times of images recorded in the second image capture device by the coarse offset to produce adjusted image capture times for images captured by the second image capture device.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

The present invention is a continuation application of U.S. patentapplication Ser. No. 13/603,181, filed Sep. 4, 2012, which is acontinuation-in-part application of and claims priority to commonlyassigned pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/033,513, titled“Organizing images captured by multiple image capture devices”, filed onFeb. 23, 2011. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/033,513 claimspriority to commonly assigned U.S. provisional patent application No.61/364,889, entitled “Organizing images captured by multiple digitalcameras” filed Jul. 16, 2010 by the same inventors. The content of aboveapplications is incorporated herein by reference.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

In recent years, photography has been transformed from chemical basedtechnologies to digital imaging technologies. A phenomenon associatedwith digital photography is the large number of images that an averageuser can generate and have to organize in a short period of time. Atypical vacation trip can easily produce hundreds to thousands ofdigital images. Digital images can be captured by different types ofimaging devices. A typical household may own a number of image capturedevices such as single-lens reflex (SLR) and point-and-shoot digitalcameras manufactured by Canon, Nikon, Kodak, HP, etc., camera phonesmade by Nokia, Apple Computer, Samsung, HTC, Motorola, etc., and videocameras that can take still images.

The captured images can be stored on local computer devices or remoteservers, and can be viewed locally or online. Digital images can also beused to create personalized image products such as photo books, photocalendars, photo cards, photo stationeries, photo prints, photo mugs,photo T-shirts, and so on. Some image products (e.g. photo books,calendars, and collages) can incorporate tens to hundreds of imagesobtained by different image capture devices. Some image usages involvedigital images taken by different users. For example, an image sharesite may publish a large number of images captured with differentdevices by different users that are associated with each other in anextended family, as classmates, members of a club or a sport team, etc.

A challenge associated with organizing digital images is that thedigital images from different imaging devices often do not carryconsistent information. The file names from different cameras aredifferent. Some image capture devices include EXIF (Exchangeable imagefile format) header files; but some do not. Additionally, theinformation stored in the EXIF header files may not be correct. Forexample, many users do not set the clocks in their digital cameras. Theclock times of many cameras are still based on the default start times(12:00:00 2006/1/1, 12:00:00 2008/1/1/) originally set in the factories.

There is therefore a need to effectively organize a large number ofimages to allow users to conveniently create image products and shareimages.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In one aspect, the present invention relates to a method forintelligently determining capture times of images for imageapplications. The method includes: dividing a first group of images withknown image capture times into first subclusters based on similaritiesbetween images, wherein each of the first subclusters comprises imagesfrom the first group having adjacent image capture times; dividing asecond group of images with unknown image capture times into secondsubclusters based on similarities between images; computing, by acomputer system, a similarity value between a first subcluster of imageswith known image capture times and a second subcluster of images withunknown image capture times; and assigning an image capture time of thefirst subcluster of images to the second subcluster of images if thesimilarity value between the first subcluster of images and the secondsubcluster of images is above a first threshold.

Implementations of the system may include one or more of the following.The method can further include sequencing the first group of images in achronological order based on image capture times; and dividing the firstgroup of images into successive clusters based on the image capturetimes before the step of dividing a first group of images with knownimage capture times into first subclusters, wherein each of thesuccessive clusters is subdivided into one or more first subclusters.The images in one of the first subclusters have similarity values higherthan a second threshold. The method can further include sequencing thesecond group of images before the step of dividing a second group ofimages into second subclusters, wherein the second subclusters eachcomprise images adjacent in the sequence. The images in the second groupcan be sequenced based on a parameter that is not image capture time.The images in the second group are sequenced based on a parameterselected from the group consisting of file names, image upload times,image reception times, and image processing times. The images in one ofthe second subclusters can have similarities higher than a thirdthreshold. The step of calculating a similarity value between a firstsubcluster of images and the second subcluster of images can includecalculating differences in one or more of parameters between the imagesin the first subcluster and the images the second subcluster, whereinthe similarity value is inversely related to the differences, whereinthe one or more of parameters comprise one or more of dominant colors,color distributions, image capture locations, detected faces, recognizedfaces, the number of people, sizes and/or prominence of the faces,detected objects, recognized objects, or sizes and/or prominence ofobjects in the images. The step of computing, by a computer system, asimilarity value between a first subcluster of images with known imagecapture times and a second subcluster of images with unknown imagecapture times can include calculating differences of a set of parametersbetween the first subcluster of images and the second subcluster ofimages; setting up a topological space based on the set of parameters;and calculating a topological distance in the topological space betweenthe first subcluster of images and the second subcluster of images basedon the calculated differences, wherein the similarity value is inverselyrelated to the topological distance. The first group of images withknown image capture times can be obtained by multiple image capturedevices can further include adjusting, by an offset, image capture timesrecorded by at least one of the multiple image capture devices. The stepof assigning can include assigning a unified image capture time of thefirst subcluster of images to the second subcluster of images if thesimilarity value between the first subcluster of images and the secondsubcluster of images is above the first threshold. The method canfurther include characterizing the first group of images by unifiedimage capture times, which adjust offset(s) between image capture timesrecorded by different ones of the multiple image capture devices. Themethod can further include sequencing the first group of images and thesecond group of images in a chronological order based on theirrespective image capture times. The method can further include allowingat least some of the first group of images and the second group ofimages to be incorporated in the chronological order into a design of animage product. The image product can include a photobook, a photocalendar, a photo story, a photo blog, or a photo slideshow. The methodcan further include allowing at least some of the first group of imagesand the second group of images to be displayed, shared or published inthe chronological order. The method can further include allowing atleast some of the second group of images to be incorporated into adesign of an image product based on the image capture times assigned tothe second group of images. The image product can include a photobook, aphoto calendar, a photo story, a photo blog, or a photo slideshow. Themethod can further include allowing at least some of the second group ofimages to be displayed, shared or published based on the image capturetimes assigned to the second group of images. The method can furtherinclude tagging the second group of images by the image capture timesassigned to the second group of images. The method can further includeallowing the second group of images to be searched or categorized basedon the image capture times assigned to the second group of images.

In another aspect, the present invention relates to a method fororganizing images from multiple image capture devices. The methodincludes: automatically determining, by a computer system, a coarseoffset between image capture times recorded in a first image capturedevice and image capture times recorded in a second image capturedevice, wherein the coarse offset is determined by a computing acorrelation between image counts of images captured by the first imagecapture device and images captured by the first image capture device;and adjusting the image capture times of images recorded in the secondimage capture device by the coarse offset to produce adjusted imagecapture times for images captured by the second image capture device.

Implementations of the system may include one or more of the following.The method can further include sequencing images captured by the firstimage capture device based on the image capture times recorded by thefirst image capture device; sampling image counts of images captured bythe first image capture device to produce a first image countdistribution (ICD); sequencing images captured by the second imagecapture device based on the image capture times recorded by the secondimage capture device; sampling image counts of images captured by thesecond image capture device to produce a second ICD; computing acorrelation function between the first ICD and the second ICD by thecomputer system; identifying, in the correlation function, one or morecorrelation peaks that are above a correlation threshold; and obtainingone or more coarse offsets from the one or more correlation peaks. Themethod can further include for the images associated with one of the oneor more correlation peaks above the correlation threshold, computing asimilarity value between images captured by the first image capturedevice and by the second image capture device by the computer system;automatically determining a fine offset between the image capture timesrecorded in the first image capture device and the image capture timesrecorded in the second image capture device if the similarity value isabove a similarity threshold value; and adjusting the image capturetimes of the images captured by the second image capture device by thefine offset. The step of calculating a similarity value between imagescaptured by the first image capture device and by the second imagecapture device can include calculating differences in one or more ofparameters between the images captured by the first image capture deviceand by the second image capture device, wherein the similarity value isinversely related to the differences, wherein the one or more ofparameters comprise colors, color distributions, textures, image capturelocations, faces and bodies detected in the images, recognized faces,the number of people, texture and colors of hair and hats if found inthe images, sizes and/or prominence of the faces, detected objects,recognized objects, or sizes and/or prominence of objects in the images.

In another aspect, the present application relates to a computer systemthat includes one or more computer processors that can enable thedetermination of an offset between image capture times recorded in afirst image capture device and image capture times recorded in a secondimage capture device, to adjust the image capture times recorded in thesecond image capture device by the offset to produce adjusted imagecapture times, and to sequence images taken by the first image capturedevice and the second image capture device in an chronological order,wherein the sequencing is based on the image capture times for theimages captured by the first image capture device and the adjusted imagecapture times for the images captured by the second image capturedevice.

In another aspect, the present application relates to a method fororganizing images from multiple image capture devices. The methodincludes allowing the determination of an offset between image capturetimes recorded in a first image capture device and image capture timesrecorded in a second image capture device; adjusting the image capturetimes recorded in the second image capture device by the offset toproduce adjusted image capture times by a computer processor; andsequencing images taken by the first image capture device and the secondimage capture device in an chronological order, wherein the sequencingis based on the image capture times for the images captured by the firstimage capture device and the adjusted image capture times for the imagescaptured by the second image capture device.

Implementations of the system may include one or more of the following.The method can further include sequencing images captured by the firstimage capture device based on the image capture times recorded by thefirst image capture device; and sequencing images captured by the secondimage capture device based on the image capture times recorded by thesecond image capture device. The step of allowing the determination ofan offset can include sampling image counts of images captured by thefirst image capture device at a first time interval to create a firstimage count distribution (ICD); sampling image counts of images capturedby the second image capture device at the first time interval to createa second ICD; computing a first correlation function between the firstICD and the second ICD by a computer; and using the correlation functionto determine a first value for the offset between image capture times inthe first image capture device and the second image capture device. Thefirst value for the offset can be determined by the maximum value incorrelation function. The first time interval can be in a range fromabout 2 min to about 45 min. The step of allowing the determination ofan offset further can include sampling image counts of images capturedby the first image capture device at a second time interval to create athird image count distribution (ICD); sampling image counts of imagescaptured by the second image capture device at the first time intervalto create a fourth ICD; computing a second correlation function betweenthe third ICD and the fourth ICD; using the correlation function todetermine a second value for the offset between image capture times inthe first and the second image capture devices; and selecting one of thefirst value and the second value, wherein the image capture timesrecorded in the second image capture device are adjusted by the selectedone of the first value and the second value. The step of allowing thedetermination of an offset further comprises: allowing a user to select,using a computer device, a first image captured by the first imagecapture device and a second image captured by the second image capturedevice and to identify the first image and the second image to be takenat about the same time; and computing the offset based on image capturetimes of the first image and the second image. The offset is related tothe difference between the clock times in the first image capture deviceand the second image capture device. The method can further includeallowing the images taken by the first image capture device and thesecond image capture device in the chronological order to be displayedon a computer device. The computer device can be connected to thecomputer processor via a computer network. The computer processor canreside in the computer device. The first image capture device and thesecond image capture device can include at least one of a digitalcamera, a camera phone, a video camera, a laptop computer, or a tabletcomputer. The method can further include allowing images from the firstimage capture device and the second image capture device to beincorporated, in the chronological order, into the design of an imageproduct. The method can further include allowing images from the firstimage capture device and the second image capture device to be publishedin the chronological order on a web media. The web media can include ablog page.

Embodiments may include one or more of the following advantages. Thedisclosed methods and systems can significantly save users' times spenton organizing a large number of digital images captured by differentimage capture devices. The disclosed methods and systems canintelligently compensate for discrepancies in clock times betweendifferent image capture devices, and automatically sequence images fromdifferent image capture devices in a correct chronological order. Thedisclosed methods and systems can make it easier for users to use imagesto tell a story about their memories. The disclosed methods and systemsalso make it easier for users to create image products such as photobooks and create photo blog pages using images captured by differentimage capture devices.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a block diagram for an imaging service system for producingpersonalized image products in accordance with the present invention.

FIG. 2 is a flowchart for intelligently organizing images from differentimage capture devices in accordance with the present invention.

FIG. 3 illustrates a user interface comprising images obtained bydifferent image capture devices.

FIG. 4 illustrates image counts along the capture time respectivelyrecorded by different image capture devices.

FIG. 5 illustrates user-enabled correlation between images obtained bydifferent image capture devices at the user interface shown in FIG. 3.

FIG. 6 illustrates the correlation and offsets between the capture timesnatively recorded by different image capture devices.

FIG. 7A shows steps for automatically determining offset between imagecapture times recorded by two image capture devices in accordance withthe present invention.

FIG. 7B shows steps for automatically determining offset between imagecapture times recorded by two image capture devices with user input inaccordance with the present invention.

FIG. 8 illustrates image counts sampled at predetermined time intervalsalong the image capture time for each of the image capture devices.

FIG. 9 shows a correlation function of the image count distributions fortwo cameras.

FIG. 10 shows image counts plotted against adjusted image capture times.

FIG. 11 shows the intelligently sequenced images taken by differentimage capture devices.

FIG. 12 is a flowchart for intelligently determining capture times ofimages with unknown capture times in accordance with the presentinvention.

Although the invention has been particularly shown and described withreference to multiple embodiments, it will be understood by personsskilled in the relevant art that various changes in form and details canbe made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of theinvention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

Referring to FIG. 1, an imaging service system 10 can enable users 70,71 to organize and share images via a wired network or a wirelessnetwork 51. Optionally, the imaging service system 10 can also fulfillimage products for the users 70, 71. The imaging service system 10includes a data center 30, one or more product fulfillment centers 40and 41, and a computer network 80 that facilitates the communicationsbetween the data center 30 and the product fulfillment centers 40 and41.

The data center 30 can include a server 32 for communicating andreceiving input from the users 70, 71, a data storage device 34 forstoring user data, image and design data, and a computer processor 36for rendering images, organizing images, and processing orders. The userdata can include account information, discount information, and orderinformation associated with the user. A website can be powered by theservers 32 and can be accessed by the user 70 using a computer device 60via the Internet 50, or by the user 71 using a wireless device 61 viathe wireless network 51.

The imaging service system 10 can provide products that require userparticipation in designs and personalization. Examples of these productsinclude the personalized image products provided by Shutterfly, Inc. Inthe present disclosure, the term “personalized” refers to theinformation that is specific to the recipient, the user, the giftproduct, and the occasion, which can include personalized content,personalized text messages, personalized images, and personalizeddesigns that can be incorporated in the image products. The content ofpersonalization can be provided by a user or selected by the user from alibrary of content provided by the service provider. The term“personalized information” can also be referred to as “individualizedinformation” or “customized information”. Furthermore, the terms“photo”, “image” and “picture” are used synonymously in the presentdisclosure.

Personalized image products can include users' photos, personalizedtext, personalized designs, and content licensed from a third party.Examples of personalized image products may include photo books,personalized greeting cards, photo stationery, photo or image prints,photo posters, photo banners, photo playing cards, photo T-shirts, photocoffee mugs, photo pads, photo key-chains, photo collectors, photocoasters, or other types of photo gift or novelty item. Photo bookgenerally refers to bound multi-page product that includes at least oneimage on a book page. Photo books can include photo albums, scrapbooks,bound photo calendars, or photo snap books, etc.

The user 70 or her family may own multiple cameras 62, 63. The user 70transfers images from cameras 62, 63 to the computer device 60. The user70 can edit, organize images from the cameras 62, 63 on the computerdevice 60. The computer device 60 can be in many different forms: apersonal computer, a laptop, or tablet computer (e.g. IPad), a mobilephone etc. The camera 62 can include a camera that is integrated orconnected with in the computer device 60. For example, laptop computersor computer monitors can include built-in camera for picture taking. Theuser 70 can also print pictures using a printer 65 and make imageproducts based on the images from the cameras 62, 63. The cameras 62, 63can include a digital camera, a camera phone, a video camera capable oftaking still images, a laptop computer, or a tablet computer.

The images from the cameras 62, 63 can also be uploaded to the server 32to allow the user 70 to organize and render images at the web site,share the images with others, and design or order image product usingthe images from the cameras 62, 63. The wireless device 61 can include amobile phone, a tablet computer, or a laptop computer, etc. The wirelessdevice 61 can include a built-in camera (e.g. in the case of a cameraphone). The images taken by the user 71 using the wireless device 61 canalso be uploaded to the data center 30. If users 70, 71 are members of afamily or associated in a group (e.g. a soccer team), the images fromthe cameras 62, 63 and the mobile device 61 can be grouped together tobe incorporated into an image product such as a photo book, or used in ablog page for an event such as a soccer game.

In accordance to the present invention, the images from different imagecapture devices can be intelligently organized on a standalone computerdevice such as the computer device 60 and the wireless device 61, or,over the computer network, by a remote computer system such as the datacenter 30 and the computer processor 36. Referring to FIGS. 2 and 3, thedigital images from different image capture devices are first separatedby file names and/or their respective manufacturers and models (step210, FIG. 2). Digital images from different image capture devices (suchas cameras 62, 63, video cameras, or a mobile phone) usually havedifferent file names such as DSC0205-DSC0208, PICT8500-PICT8503,IMG2808-2811 . . . etc., as shown in a user interface 300. The numbersafter the alphabet characters indicate the sequence in which the imagesare captured by the specific image capture device. For example, theimages from three cameras are separated into different groups 10, 20,and 30.

The user interface 300 can be provided by a software applicationinstalled on the computer device 60 (or the mobile device 61), whichfacilitates image viewing, organization, editing, rendering, and/orimage product design using images on the same computer device (or mobiledevice). The user interface 300 can also be implemented as a web browseror a client application, which serves as a communication interface witha remote server such as server 32 via a computer network such as theInternet 50 or the wireless network 51.

The capture times of the images are then extracted from the images fromeach image capture device (step 220, FIG. 2). The image capture timesare often stored in the EXIF files associated with the images. Theimages from each image capture device are then sequenced using thenative image capture times originally stored by the image capturedevices (step 230, FIG. 2). Although the clock of an image capturedevice may not reflect the real time and date, the native capture timesof the image capture device can provide correct relative chronologicalorder (but may not reflect the correct absolute times) for imagescaptured by that image capture device. For example, the imagesDSC0205-DSC0208 in the group 10 are chronologically sequenced accordingto their respective natively recorded capture times. Similarly, theimages in the group 20 and the group 30 are respectively sequenced usingthe image capture times of their respective image capture devices.

However, because the clocks of different image capture devices are oftennot correctly set, the images in the different groups 10, 20, 30 cannotbe sequenced using a common capture time. For images taken at the sametime, the image capture times recorded by different image capturedevices often differ by an offset because some or all of the imagecapture devices do not have the correct dates and times.

The offsets on image capture times between different image capturedevices can be determined manually or automatically (step 240, FIG. 2).FIG. 4 illustrates image capture times of images captured by differentcameras. Image captures by camera 1, camera 2, and camera 3 are plottedagainst their respective native capture times. Images captured by thethree cameras are clustered around events such as “zoo”, “beach”, and“dinner”, which however are recorded with different the image capturetimes on different cameras.

In some embodiments, the offset time can be manually determined with theassistance of a user. As shown in FIG. 5, the user can use the imagecontent as clues to select images in different groups 10, 20, 30 thatwere captured at approximately the same times. For example, if imagesDSC0205, PICT8502, IMG2809 include the same scene (e.g., kids buildingsand castle on a beach), the user can remember or infer that theseimages from different cameras are taken at about the same time. The usercan click and highlight one image (e.g. DSC0205, PICT8502, IMG2809) ineach group 10, 20, 30 to identify these images as being taken at aboutthe same time.

Referring to FIG. 6, the correlations between images DSC0205, PICT8502,IMG2809 are illustrated by the double-headed arrows connecting theimages from different cameras. The offset between cameras 1 and camera 2is indicated by offset 21. The offset 21 is related to the differencesbetween the clock times of camera 1 and camera 2. The offset betweencameras 1 and camera 3 is indicated by offset 31. Once the images takenby different cameras at about the same time are correlated by the user,the computer device 60 or the computer processor 36 (FIG. 1) cancalculate offset 21 (step 240, FIG. 2) by subtracting the capture timeof the image PICT8502 by the image capture time of the image DSC0205.Similarly, the computer device 60 or the computer processor 36 (FIG. 1)can calculate offset 31 (step 240, FIG. 2) by subtracting the capturetime of the image IMG2809 by the image capture time of the imageDSC0205.

In some embodiments, referring to FIG. 7A, the offsets between imagecapture times of different cameras can be automatically determined by acomputer processor in the computer device 60 or the mobile device 61, orthe computer processor 36. A time interval e.g. 5 min or 10 min isselected (step 710). For each camera, the image counts can be sampledalong its natively recorded image capture time, in other words, allimages captured in each time interval is summed up and recorded as theimage count for that time interval (steps 720, 730). The resulting imagecounts distributions (ICDs) for images from different camera 1 (ICD1),camera 2 (ICD2), and camera 3 (ICD3) are shown in FIG. 8. The imagestaken by the three cameras at the same event ICDs also differ by offsetssimilar to the raw image counts as shown in FIGS. 4 and 6.

Referring to FIG. 9, a correlation function 12 between ICD1 and ICD2 canbe calculated (step 740) by the computer device 60, the mobile device61, or the computer processor 36 (FIG. 2). Most pictures on camera 1 andcamera 2 are both taken mostly at “photographic events” (e.g. zoo,beach). Picture taking at other times are few and not correlated betweenthe two cameras. The correlation between ICD2 and ICD1 should be peakedat the offset 21, when plotted as a function of the delta capture time21 (the difference between the capture times of the two cameras). Inother words, the maximum value of the correlation function can be usedto determine the offset 21 in the capture times (or the clock and dates)between the two cameras (step 750). Similarly, offset 31 can beautomatically determined by the computer device 60 or the computerprocessor 36 (FIG. 2) by computing the correlation function between ICD3and ICD1.

The precision and the accuracy of the offset times can be improved byvarying the time interval for sampling the image counts. While shorttime intervals (e.g. 15 seconds, 30 seconds, 1 min, etc.) can be precisein sampling image capture times, the image count within each timeinterval is low and so is the chance that two cameras capture images atexactly the same moment. The correlation functions can often be noisyfor accurately determining offset. On the other hand, although long timeintervals (e.g. 60 min, 90 min, etc.) tend to include higher imagecounts per time interval, there is a higher probability that differentevents are covered in the same time interval, which decreases thespecificity in correlating different events. By selecting a second timeinterval (step 760), a second offset value can be determined using steps720-750 between the image capture times of the first and second cameras(step 770). An offset value can be selected among different values basedon a predetermined criterion such as a higher signal-to-noise ratio(e.g. the maximum value relative to background) at a narrower peak widthin the correlation function (step 780). Varying the duration of timeinterval can optimize the temporal precision (relating to peak width)and the accuracy (relating to sign-to-noise ratio) in the determinationof the offset. For example, an optimal period may be found in a rangeincluding 2 min, 5 min, 10 min, 15, min, 20 min, 30 min, and 45 min timeintervals for sampling image counts in ICDs.

In some embodiments, an offset value can be selected among differentoffset values (step 780) based on user input as described in relation toFIGS. 5 and 6. Comparing to the steps described in FIGS. 5 and 6, theautomatic correlation can help pre-screen possible offsets to make iteasier for the user to identify the corresponding photo events betweendifferent image capture devices.

In some embodiments, accuracy of determining capture-time offset betweendifferent image capture devices can be improved by further intelligenceand image analysis. Referring to FIG. 7B, similar to steps 720 and 730described above (FIGS. 7A, 8), image counts of images captured by thefirst image capture device are sampled to produce a first image countdistribution (step 810). The time interval used in the ICD calculationscan be relatively coarse, for example, at 10 min, 20 min, 30 min, oreven 60 min, which can increase image counts per interval. Image countsof images captured by the second image capture device are sampled toproduce a second image count distribution (step 820). A correlationfunction between the image count distributions can be calculated (step830) by the computer device 60, the mobile device 61, or the computerprocessor 36 (FIG. 2) similar to the step 740 described above (FIG. 7A,FIG. 9). The correlation function can include multiple peaks that areidentified to be above a predetermined threshold. The delta capturetimes at these peaks represent potential or coarse capture-time offsetsbetween the first and the second image capture devices (step 840).

Images associated with one of correlation peaks above threshold arepotentially recorded at a same event by the two image capture devices.Since image objects and image content generally are similar in imagesrecorded at the same event, a similarity value is computed betweenimages associated with a same correlation peak and captured by the twoimage capture devices (step 850).

The similarity values for images associated with correlation peaks canbe calculated using a similarity function based on multiple parameterssuch as colors, textures, directional similarities, objects found onimage, geo location tags (if present), faces and bodies detected in animage, texture and colors of hair and hats if found in the images,detected objects, recognized objects, or sizes and/or prominence ofobjects in the images. A similarity function can be a sum, a weightedsum, a sum of squares of the correlation value of one or more of themultiple parameters.

A fine capture-time offset value is obtained between the first and thesecond image capture devices based on the similarity values associatedwith the correlation peaks (step 860). A correlation peak can beselected when its associated similarity value between images from thetwo different image capture devices is above a predetermined similaritythreshold and by the higher similarity value.

Optionally, a second correlation function between the two ICDs can becalculated using a shorter time interval (step 870) similar to the steps760 and 770 described above (FIG. 7A). Another fine capture-time offsetvalue can be obtained based on similarity values between images capturedby the different image capture devices at the shorter time interval(step 880).

In some embodiments, when three or more image capture devices areinvolved, the calculated capture-time offsets among the three or moreimage capture devices need to be unified to be consistent with eachother (step 245). For example, if the calculated offset 12 (between thefirst and second image capture devices) is 12 min and the calculatedoffset 23 is 2 min, but the calculated offset 13 is 19 min instead ofabout 14 min, which results in inconsistency. On way to overcome this isto calculate multiple possible offsets above a threshold for each pairof image capture devices as described in steps 840-880 in FIG. 8. Aconsistent offset can be selected among several options. For example, ifthe calculated offsets 23 include 2 min and 6.5 min, the offset value6.5 min is selected because 12 min+6.5 min is approximately 19 min.Another method of achieving consistency between offsets of three or morecapture-time image capture devices is rely on the offsets with highercorrelation strengths or higher similarity values, and to override theoffset with lower correlation strengths or lower similarity value. Usingthe above-described example, if the calculated offset 12 of 12 min andthe calculated offset 23 of 2 min have higher correlation strengths orhigher similarity values than the calculated offset 13, then thecalculated offset 23 is overridden. The offset 23 is derived by the sumof the calculated offset 12 min and the calculated offset 23, whichresults in 14 min.

Once the offsets (e.g. Offset 12 and Offset 13) in the capture timesbetween cameras are determined (automatically or manually or acombination of both), the offsets are subtracted from the respectivecapture times of the different image capture devices (step 250, FIG. 2)to product adjusted capture times. For example, the capture time ofcamera 1 can be used as a common reference. The capture times of imagesby camera 2 are subtracted by offset 21 such that the image capturetimes of images obtained by both camera 1 and camera 2 are based on theoriginal capture time of camera 1. Similarly, the capture times ofimages by camera 3 are subtracted by offset 31. The adjusted capturetimes are stored in association with their respective images obtained bycameras 2 and 3 (step 260, FIG. 2). The adjusted capture times can forexample be stored in the respective EXIF files or in a separate metadatafield. Since the native capture time of camera 1 is used as the standardbase capture time, no adjustment is needed for the capture times forimages from camera 1. FIG. 10 shows that the image counts of camera 2and camera 3 are plotted against the adjusted image capture times.

The images from image capture devices (camera 2-3) are sequenced usingtheir respective adjusted capture times (step 270, FIG. 2). The imagesobtained by camera 1 are based on their originally recorded imagecapture times because they are used as the reference for determining theoffset (so the adjusted image capture times for camera 1 are the same asthe original image capture times). The images from different imagecapture devices (cameras 1-3) are combined in a list in the userinterface 300, and sequenced in a chronological order based on adjustedimage capture times (cameras 2, 3) on the computer device 60, the mobiledevice 61, or enabled by the server 32, as shown in FIG. 11 (step 280,FIG. 2). The common image capture times for camera 1, 2, and 3 can becalled “unified image capture time”.

In the present invention, it is not necessary that the capture time usedas the common reference is set as the correct time and date. In somecases, none of the cameras has the time and date. The images fromdifferent cameras or other image capture devices can be chronicallysequenced without knowing or using the correct date or time.

After the images from different cameras are combined in a single groupin the user interface 300 and sequenced in a chronological order basedon unified image capture times, the user 70, 71 can create an imageproduct such as a photobook or a web media such as a blog page, usingthe images from different image capture devices based on the unifiedimage capture times (step 290, FIG. 2). The web media containing theimages can be published by the server 32 via computer network in thechronicle sequence based on the unified image capture times.

The image product such as the photobook can be locally produced, orordered by the user 70, 71 at the data center 30 and then sent toproduct a fulfillment center 40, 41, which produces the orderedproducts, and deliver the recipients (100, 105 in FIG. 1) specified bythe user 70, 71. The product fulfillment center 40 includes a server 42,and the storage and retrieving systems for pre-made off-the-shelfproducts. For the fulfillments of personalized image products, theproduct fulfillment center 40 can include one or more printers 45 forprinting images, finishing equipment 46 for operations such as cutting,folding, binding the printed image sheets, and shipping stations 48 forverifying the orders and shipping the orders to recipients 100 and 105.Examples of the printers 45 include can be digital photographicprinters, offset digital printers, digital printing presses, and inkjetprinters. The finishing equipment 46 can perform operations forfinishing a complete image product other than printing, for example,cutting, folding, adding a cover to photo book, punching, stapling,gluing, binding, and envelope printing and sealing. The shippingstations 48 may perform tasks such as packaging, labeling, packageweighing, and postage metering.

An advantageous application for chronically sequencing images fromdifferent capture devices is the creation of photobooks. A photobook mayutilize hundreds of images from different cameras. Most users like toplace images on the book pages in a chronological order: earlier imagesappear on the first few pages while later images appear on the laterpages. Once the images are correctly sequenced, it is much easier for auser to select and place images onto the pages. In some embodiments,chronically sequenced images allow the images to be automatically placedon the book pages, which can greatly reduce the time and effort requiredfor a user to create a photobook.

In some embodiments, some images received by a computer system do notcome with information about their capture times. These images can beviewed and used by themselves, or with images that are associated withcapture times. Because people remember and preserve their memoriesaccording to time, image capture times are very useful information inmany image applications. In many image applications, it is necessary toproperly sequence images in a correct chronological sequence orcategorize images in intervals of a year, a quarter, a month or a day,etc. For example, for viewing and sharing of images, and storytellingusing images, it is often desirable to organize images based on years,months, and days of the image capture times. Image capture times and achronological sequence of images are also very useful in image productdesigns. For example, for photobooks and photo calendars, the placementsof images within or across different pages can be assisted by capturetimes of the images, and/or a chronological sequence based on imagecapture times.

Referring to FIG. 12, when images are received by a computer system, theimages with known capture times are sequenced according to their imagecapture times (step 1210). The images may be obtained by different imagecapture devices, which may have offset in their clock times. Asdescribed above in relation to FIGS. 1-11, the offset between imagecapture times recorded by different image capture devices can bedetermined and adjusted to allow images from different image capturedevices to be sequenced based their “unified adjusted capture times”.When capture times are not adjusted, the “unified adjusted capturetimes” are the same as the image capture times recorded by image capturedevice(s).

The images having capture times are then divided and grouped intosuccessive clusters based on their image capture times or unifiedcapture times (step 1220). Each cluster comprises pictures taken atrelative high rate in a short interval. Adjacent clusters are oftenseparated by a pause in picture taking. For example, a set of imagestaken in relatively high rate after and/or before a long cease (forexample, relative to the high rate) may be grouped into a cluster oftime-related images. Details about clustering images are disclosed inthe commonly assigned pending U.S. patent application Ser. No.13/520,325, titled “System and method for creating a collection ofimages”, filed on Jul. 2, 2012, the content of which is incorporatedherein by reference.

The images having similar capture times within at least some of theclusters are then subdivided into subclusters based on similaritiesamong the images (step 1230). Within each cluster, images sharing highsimilarity can be assigned into a same subcluster. The similarity valuebetween images can be determined based on one or more of anon-exhaustive list of parameters such as dominant colors in an image,color distribution in an image, image capture location of an image,detected face(s) in an image, recognized face(s) in an image, the numberof people in an image, size and/or prominence of the face(s) in animage, detected object(s) in an image, recognized object(s) in an image,size and/or prominence of the object(s) in an image, as well as exactimage capture times of the images within the cluster, etc. A globalweighted function based a plurality such parameters can be used todetermine the overall similarity between two images. Details of groupingimages in subclusters are disclosed in the commonly assigned pendingU.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/520,325, titled “System and methodfor creating a collection of images”, filed on Jul. 2, 2012, the contentof which is incorporated herein by reference.

In many cases, images do not come with capture times. Some image capturedevices may not have recorded capture times. Some images may have beenstored at an intermediate location, such as a social network, in whichthe image capture times have been stripped or not shared. Some imagesmay have been edited, cropped, and saved without capture times in theirheaders. As described above, in many applications, it is very useful andoften necessary to determine the capture times of these images. Theimage capture times can be based on true time, or based on unified imagecapture times, which both define the relative chronological sequencebetween images.

The images with unknown capture times are first sequenced (step 1240) byparameters (other than capture times) such as their file names (oftenembedded with a sequential number by the image capture devices), thetimes at which the images are respectively received by or uploaded tothe computer system, the times at which the images are respectivelyprocessed, etc.

The images with unknown capture times are then divided into subclustersbased on similarities among the images (step 1250). Successive images inthe sequence that share high similarities are assigned into a samesubcluster. Similar to the subclustering of the images with known imagecapture times, the similarity between images can be determined based ondifferences between the images in image content and image properties,such as, dominant colors in an image, color, intensity or gradientsdistribution in an image, image capture location of an image, detectedface(s) in an image, recognized face(s) in an image, the number ofpeople in an image, size and/or prominence of the face(s) in an image,detected object(s) in an image, recognized object(s) in an image, andsize and/or prominence of the object(s) in an image, etc. A globalweighted function based a plurality such parameters can be used todetermine the overall similarity between two images. Details of dividingimages in subclusters are disclosed in the commonly assigned pendingU.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/520,325, titled “System and methodfor creating a collection of images”, filed on Jul. 2, 2012, the contentof which is incorporated herein by reference.

To determine image capture times of images with unknown capture times,the computer system computes a similarity value between a firstsubcluster of images with known image capture times and a secondsubcluster of images with unknown capture times (step 1260). If a secondsubcluster of images is found to be similar to a first subcluster ofimages, that is, if the similarity value between the two subclusters isabove a threshold, the second subcluster of images is associated withthe first subcluster of images (step 1270). The similarity value betweensubclusters of images with unknown capture times and known capture timescan be calculated based on the differences of parameters in imagecontent or properties between the two subclusters. Examples of theparameters include: dominant colors in an image, color, intensity orgradients distribution in an image, image capture location of an image,detected face(s) in an image, recognized face(s) in an image, the numberof people in an image, size and/or prominence of the face(s) in animage, detected object(s) in an image, recognized object(s) in an image,and size and/or prominence of the object(s) in an image, etc. A globalweighted function based a plurality such parameters can be used todetermine the overall similarity between two images.

In some embodiments, the parameters for similarity calculations are usedto set up a topological space. The topological distance between thefirst subcluster and the second subcluster in the topological space iscalculated. The topological distance indicates the combineddissimilarity between the two subclusters, taking into account all theparameters that constitute the topological space. A larger topologicaldistance indicates a larger combined dissimilarity between the twosubclusters. The topological distance can be calculated based on thecalculated differences in parameters. When the topological distance issmaller than a predetermined threshold, the first subcluster and thesecond subcluster can be considered as similar. The determination of thethreshold may be performed by statistical analysis, which may beperformed by the computer system. The threshold may be different fordifferent groups of images or different clusters of images with knownimage capture times, according to particular statistical analyses.

When the first cluster and the second cluster are found to be similar(i.e. with the similarity value above a threshold), a (unified) capturetime of the first subcluster of images is assigned to the secondsubcluster of images with unknown capture times (step 1280). Since theimages in the second subcluster of images are likely taken in a shorttime segment, they can be assigned to a same (unified) image capturetime.

In some embodiments, if a second cluster of images with unknown capturetimes can be matched to any of the first cluster of images with knowncapture times using the similarity calculations, the image capture timesof that second cluster of images can be interpolated by the assignedimage capture times of other adjacent second clusters of images withunknown capture times assuming the images with unknown capture times aresequenced as described above (step 1240).

As images previously with unknown image capture times are now assignedwith (unified) image capture times, both types of images (previouslywith known or unknown capture times) can now be sequenced based on acommon (unified) image capture time (step 1290). The sequence of imagescan be presented for image applications such as image displaying andpublishing, image sharing, image product designs such as photobooks andphoto calendars, and photo storytelling, etc.

The images previously with unknown capture times can generally be usedin image applications based on the assigned image capture times (step1300). For example, the design of a greeting card or a calendar canincorporate an image previously without capture time information basedon the image capture time assigned to the image. The image can be usedin similar fashion in other applications such as photo story, photoblogs or publishing, photo sharing, and so on. The assigned imagecapture times can be stored as tags or keywords with images previouslywith unknown capture times to allow these images to be searched andcategorized based on the assigned image capture times.

An advantage of the above disclosed methods is that images can beautomatically comprehended by a computer system to allow intelligentusages of images to preserve people's memories. Another advantage of theabove disclosed methods is that automatically inferred and more accurateinformation allow images to be presented in ways more natural to thenarratives of people's memories. The above disclosed methods can alsosignificantly save time that people spend on organizing photos andcreating image product designs.

It should be noted that the image applications of the above disclosedmethods and systems are not limited to the examples described above. Theimage applications include physical image products, digital or virtualimage presentations, as well as motion or video image applications.

Detailed configurations and steps can differ from the examples describedabove without deviating from the spirit of the present invention. Thecomputer systems suitable for the disclosed methods can include wired orwireless, networked or standalone devices. The disclosed methods are notlimited to applications over computer network; rather, they areapplicable to standalone computer devices such as personal computers,laptop computers, tablet computers, mobile devices, and other computingdevices that can help users to organize images. The image capturedevices, the computer devices, and the wireless devices are not limitedto the examples used above.

What is claimed is:
 1. A computer system for intelligently determiningcapture times of images for image applications, comprising: a computerprocessor configured to sequence or receive a first group of images withknown image capture times in a chronological order based on imagecapture times, wherein the computer processor is configured to dividethe first group of images in the chronological order into firstsubclusters based on similarities between images, wherein the images inat least one of the first subclusters have a first similarity valuehigher than a first threshold, wherein the first similarity value isbased on one or more of dominant colors, color distributions, imagecapture locations, detected faces, recognized faces, the number ofpeople, sizes and/or prominence of the faces, detected objects,recognized objects, or sizes and/or prominence of objects in the images,wherein each of the first subclusters comprises images from the firstgroup having adjacent image capture times, wherein the computerprocessor is configured to divide a second group of images with unknownimage capture times into second subclusters based on similaritiesbetween images, wherein the computer processor is configured to computea second similarity value between a first subcluster of images withknown image capture times and a second subcluster of images with unknownimage capture times, and to assign an image capture time of the firstsubcluster of images to the second subcluster of images if the secondsimilarity value between the first subcluster of images and the secondsubcluster of images is above a second threshold, thereby producing aunified image capture times for the first subcluster of images to thesecond subcluster of images based on known image capture times of firstsubclusters and image capture times assigned to the second subclusters.2. The computer system of claim 1, wherein the computer processor isconfigured to sequence the second group of images before the step ofdividing a second group of images into second subclusters, wherein thesecond subclusters each comprise images adjacent in the sequence.
 3. Thecomputer system of claim 2, wherein the images in the second group aresequenced based on a parameter that is not image capture time.
 4. Thecomputer system of claim 3, wherein the images in the second group aresequenced based on a parameter selected from the group consisting offile names, image upload times, image reception times, and imageprocessing times.
 5. The computer system of claim 1, wherein the imagesin one of the second sub clusters have similarities higher than a thirdthreshold.
 6. The computer system of claim 1, wherein the computerprocessor is further configured to calculate differences in one or moreof parameters between the images in the first subcluster and the imagesthe second subcluster, wherein the second similarity value is inverselyrelated to the differences, wherein the one or more of parameterscomprise one or more of dominant colors, color distributions, imagecapture locations, detected faces, recognized faces, the number ofpeople, sizes and/or prominence of the faces, detected objects,recognized objects, or sizes and/or prominence of objects in the images.7. The computer system of claim 1, wherein the computer processor isfurther configured to calculate differences of a set of parametersbetween the first subcluster of images and the second subcluster ofimages, to set up a topological space based on the set of parameters,and calculate a topological distance in the topological space betweenthe first subcluster of images and the second subcluster of images basedon the calculated differences, wherein the second similarity value isinversely related to the topological distance.
 8. The computer system ofclaim 1, wherein the first group of images with known image capturetimes are obtained by multiple image capture devices, wherein thecomputer processor is further configured to adjust image capture timesrecorded by at least one of the multiple image capture devices by anoffset.
 9. The computer system of claim 8, wherein the computerprocessor is further configured to assign a unified image capture timeof the first subcluster of images to the second subcluster of images ifthe second similarity value between the first subcluster of images andthe second subcluster of images is above the second threshold, and tocharacterize the first group of images by unified image capture timeswhich adjust offset(s) between image capture times recorded by differentones of the multiple image capture devices.
 10. The computer system ofclaim 1, wherein the computer processor is further configured tosequence the first group of images and the second group of images in achronological order based on the unified image capture times.
 11. Thecomputer system of claim 10, wherein the computer processor is furtherconfigured to incorporate at least some of the first group of images andthe second group of images in the chronological order into a design ofan image product.
 12. The computer system of claim 11, wherein the imageproduct comprises a photobook, a photo calendar, a photo story, a photoblog, or a photo slideshow.
 13. The computer system of claim 10, whereinthe computer processor is further configured to display, sharing orpublishing at least some of the first group of images and the secondgroup of images in the chronological order.
 14. The computer system ofclaim 1, wherein the computer processor is further configured toincorporate at least some of the second group of images into a design ofan image product based on the image capture times assigned to the secondgroup of images.
 15. The computer system of claim 14, wherein the imageproduct comprises a photobook, a photo calendar, a photo story, a photoblog, or a photo slideshow.
 16. The computer system of claim 1, whereinthe computer processor is further configured to display, sharing orpublishing at least some of the second group of images based on theimage capture times assigned to the second group of images.
 17. Thecomputer system of claim 1, wherein the computer processor is furtherconfigured to tag the second group of images by the image capture timesassigned to the second group of images.
 18. The computer system of claim17, wherein the computer processor is further configured to search orcategorizing the second group of images based on the image capture timesassigned to the second group of images.